Canberra, November 18, 2025 — Australia’s national science agency CSIRO is facing a deepening crisis, with plans to slash 300–350 more research jobs in 2026, reigniting fierce criticism from staff, unions, and scientific leaders. 

Here’s a detailed breakdown of what’s happening, who’s affected, and why this matters for the future of publicly funded science in Australia.

What’s Going On: Job Losses & Cuts

  1. New Round of Cuts

    • CSIRO has announced its intention to cut up to 350 research roles next year. 

    • These cuts are being framed as part of a broader effort to secure $80 million–$135 million every year, largely to renovate CSIRO’s aging infrastructure. 

    • The roles expected to be most affected include health & biosecurity, agriculture & food, and environmental research

  2. Support & Enterprise Services Cuts

    • This is not the first wave of cuts. Earlier, CSIRO announced plans to eliminate up to 500 non-scientific / support roles across its enterprise services division. 

    • The Staff Association says cuts in “people function” roles will reduce full-time equivalent (FTE) positions from 207 to 171.2 FTE, including ~36 roles cut from Health, Safety & Environment (HSE). 

    • In HSE specifically, there will be 5.86 fewer FTEs, raising serious concerns about CSIRO’s capacity to manage workplace health and safety. 

  3. Data61 Research Cuts by “Stealth”

    • The Data61 unit (CSIRO’s advanced data, AI, and digital research arm) reportedly lost over 100 fixed-term research contracts in the past year, roughly 20% of its workforce, according to union claims. 

    • Union leaders say these cuts were carried out quietly and without transparent consultation, fueling distrust. 

  4. Budget & Headcount Drop

    • According to internal CSIRO data and budget statements, employee costs are expected to fall by $91 million in the 2025–26 fiscal year. 

    • Since July 2024, CSIRO’s headcount has already declined by 12.7%, equivalent to around 818 jobs

MORE ARTICLES:

Reaction & Criticism: Staff Association Speaks Out

  • CSIRO Staff Association, led by Section Secretary Susan Tonks, has strongly condemned the cuts. In response to the latest announcement, Tonks called it “a very sad day for publicly funded science.” 

  • The union claims that the cuts are more severe than those under the previous conservative government — despite recent rhetoric from the current Labour government in support of science. 

  • In a recent survey of over 4,000 CSIRO staff, only 36% felt leadership was communicating a “motivational vision” for the organisation, and many expressed low confidence in the agency’s direction. 

  • The Staff Association has also raised alarms over the restructure’s impact on mental health and safety capacity: with fewer HSE staff and only one permanent Mental Health Specialist for thousands of employees. 

Broader Implications & Scientific Risk

  • Experts warn that further cutting CSIRO’s capacity could jeopardize Australia’s long-term innovation and productivity

  • The agency says the restructuring allows it to “refocus” on core national challenges, and deliver science at scale. 

  • However, critics argue that slashing research roles — especially in vital areas like health, agriculture, and environment — undermines Australia’s ability to respond to major public policy and climate challenges. 

  • There are calls for government intervention: unions and science advocates say these cuts reflect a failure to invest in public science, and are pushing for renewed funding commitments. 

Location Spotlight: Hobart

  • In parallel to the job cuts, CSIRO has announced a new climate research hub in Hobart, which will create 40 full-time scientist roles

  • Despite this investment, staff warn that the hub may not offset the broader job losses, especially if research in other areas is “exited” or de-prioritized. 

  • For many in Tasmania, the job cuts represent a chilling uncertainty: local CPSU representatives say staff are in “limbo” regarding which research units will survive. 

What CSIRO Says

  • CSIRO management argues the restructure is vital for long-term financial sustainability. “We must evolve, becoming sharper in our focus, doing fewer things — better and at scale,” agency leaders claim. 

  • According to CSIRO, the cuts should help the agency concentrate on six priority areas: energy & minerals, food & fibre, nature, health, the tech economy, and “from wonder to discovery.” 

  • CSIRO also insists it’s following due process: workforce planning will happen under its enterprise agreement, with “consultation with staff” before final decisions. 

Why This Matters to Australia

  • CSIRO is Australia’s flagship science agency — it has played a central role in pioneering research across agriculture, environment, health, and technology for decades.

  • Reducing its research capacity could not only weaken Australia’s innovation pipeline, but also impair its ability to address emerging global challenges like climate change, food security, and biosecurity.

  • The cuts also highlight broader political tension: while governments often praise science publicly, long-term investment in research infrastructure and people remains under pressure.

  • If these job cuts continue, there could be far-reaching effects: loss of talent (especially early-career scientists), reduced morale, and a weaker national science ecosystem.